Joe Riley

From Courses
Revision as of 21:11, 4 October 2007 by Jlrile (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Joe's IRB Certificate: Media:joe.pdf


I'm Joe Riley and I will be graduating this December (2007) with my Masters Degree in Health Systems Engineering. I was born and raised in Charleston, SC and got my undergraduate degree in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.

Things I do outside of school are play guitar (been in 3 bands), any water sports, or sports in general, go to hang out with my college buds at Clemson football games, and hang out with my fiance Leigh.

Life is such a fortunate experience and I'm so grateful to be here... Especially in a class with all of you brilliant people!

[1] Joe's HSI page...


8/30/07 - Hughes Spalding Visit... The site visit was a great success. I saw many opportunities for improvement while also opening up my eyes to the world of pediatric healthcare. The mission of a children's hospital is so touching. It is a moving experience to see children being healed.

Overview -

Hughes Spalding is a 42 bed hospital that does primary care mainly and focuses on the following service lines: -Asthma -Sickle Cell -Child Advocacy

The hospital plans to upgrade it's outdated facilities in the near future. This has presented a huge challenge.

The group was fortunate enough to step in on the end of a design meeting for the new construction plans. It was very interesting to see how the staff at Hughes Spalding is planning to take a 1951 based design into year 2015 and beyond. The group's focus seemed to be one: -Crowd Control -Staffing Efficiencies -Adaptability -Specific Diseases

Observations - 1. The old marble and other materials created a very gloomy feel throughout the hospital. 2. The facilities were unable to support some newer technologies (i.e. the power setup could not support new radiology equipment; therefore the equipment being used was over 25 years old). 3. The tunnel (owned by Grady) has several problems that could be solved by this class. 4. Wayfinding was confusing around the hospital. 5. The waiting room for families was very small.

New Ideas 1. The new children's playroom could be an excellent project. 2. We could collaborate with the Child Life specialist in using evidence based design for the new playroom. 3. The tunnel to Grady could use improvements. 4. There is a need for purposeful wayfinding signage for the new entrance layout to the hospital. 5. The waiting room layouts could be improved.

Conversations - 1. Dr. Zimring and I discussed where the lead architect for the project came from. 2. Listened to the tour guide and asked questions. 3. Talked with Elaine Smith about creative ways to improve the tunnel.

9/4/07 - The presentation on patient-centered design (PCD) was very interesting. While it sounds like such a fluffy idea, if executed accurately, it could reshape the way we deliver care. The only way to really make patient-centered design become a reality is to get buy-in from clinicians. PCD should be built into clinician training in med schools, etc.

9/11/07 - First off, Ellen's presentation on Technology in Design was awesome. Some of the design examples that her previous classes created were very inspirational. This presentation has challenged me and given me the confidence to really think outside of the box. I'm really interested in exploring how to use external changes (lighting, etc.) to build good behavioral habits (hand washing, etc.) into processes through intuitive and organic design.

9/25/07 - I feel like the class is on the brink of doing great things. Today we finished up the team presentations and began to write possible problem statements. The problem statements mentioned so far will all be great opportunities for us to design solutions.

10/4/07 - It's crunch time. We finished up presentations today and it is time for the teams to go back and turn our principles, problems, and evidence into 2 succinct opportunities with excellent solutions. My personal concern is that there can be overlap in these projects. Therefore, Mr. Cowan proposed that we submit 3 ideas to the professors so they can let us know if other groups have similar ideas. The solutions should be a little sharper than blue sky solutions. For example, we're not going to implement past ideas; we're going to expand upon these ideas by doing this, this, and this... The solution has to be clear enough to warrant criticism. The professor's may push our solutions to get them molded into applicable solutions; therefore, we need to make them flexible.